|
In most Greek cities there are significant differences between helots and slaves. In general, a slave was his master's possession. The helot on the contrary belonged to the Spartan state. That is, he had been ceded by the state to a citizen who did not have the right to use him according to his own will. Also, in other regions slaves could often gain their freedom. On the contrary, in Sparta a helot could not be freed, with very few exceptions. That way he was freer, but at the same time more restrained that slaves in the rest of Greece (Thucydides, Histories 1.101.7-9). |
It is correct to compare the helots to the penestai of Thessaly, the aphamiotai, the mnoitai (those who had been dominated?) and the klarotai (those who were bound with land-the klaros?) of Crete, the korynephoroi of Sicyon, the gymnetai (those who were naked-gymnoi-, that is unarmed) of Argos and the oikiatai of Locris (those who belonged to the oikos). These groups were indigenous peoples who had been reduced to the level of owned slaves after the invasion and their conquest by the Doric tribes and were usually considered part of the family property. |
| |
|
Note: Click on a picture for a brief description. |