. | ||||||||
|
Historiographical works of the 13th and 14th century he momentous events which took place in the Byzantine empire from the time of the first conquest of Constantinople by the Franks in 1204 to the middle of the14th century were recorded by four eminent personalities in their Histories, each writer continuing, consciously or not, the work of the other. All of them (three scholars and one emperor) lived close to the imperial court of Constantinople and were therefore in a position to follow developments at first hand.
George Akropolites was the first in this list of historians. He recorded events from 1203 to 1261 in his work Chronike Syngraphe, thus continuing the work of an older historian,
His disciple and successor,
George Pachymeres, did not see eye to eye with him. In the 13 books of his work Syngraphikai Historiai he recorded, in a more pessimistic mood, the events of the period between 1260 and 1308. The reason for this was the situation in the empire, which he perceived not from the viewpoint of a politician or a general but in his capacity as a functionary of the Patri
The most eventful century, the 14th century, which was marked by the civil wars of the time of
John Kantakouzenos, who reigned as emperor from 1347 to 1354 was, on the contrary, a supporter of hesychasm and was responsible for the civil war. In spite of the fact that he made an effort to be objective, his Historiai inevitably ended up being an apologia, an attempt to justify his political actions. Kantakouzenos was the last important historian of the 14th century. In the second half of the century, no more histories were written, so that our only source of historical information thenceforth are the chronicles.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||